SQL Injection
ID |
javascript.sql_injection |
Severity |
critical |
Resource |
Injection |
Language |
JavaScript |
Tags |
CWE:89, NIST.SP.800-5, OWASP:2021:A3, PCI-DSS:6.5.1 |
Description
Improper neutralization of special elements in SQL Commands ('SQL Injection' aka 'SQL').
SQL Injection vulnerabilities are predominant in applications that incorporate user input directly into SQL queries without adequate validation or sanitization. This allows malicious users to inject SQL commands that can alter the functionality of the original query.
By launching an SQL injection attack, threat actors may leak sensitive data from the database, alter data for their profit, delete data for denial of service, extract passwords and other credentials for offline dictionary attacks, or gain access to other systems within the network exploiting trust relationships.
Rationale
As with most injection vulnerabilities, inserting external input into SQL code is common practice when dealing with dynamic queries, as the engine may not provide options to code a table or column name(s), values for the IN operator, or dynamic WHERE conditions.
However, the concatenation of unsanitized input into SQL code almost always allows for the modification of the intended query.
The following example shows a vulnerable code snippet in JavaScript using the pg
:
var mysql = require('mysql');
var connection = mysql.createConnection(process.env.DATABASE_URL);
connection.connect();
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/sql_injection', (req, res) => {
let query = "select * from users where username = '" + req.query.username + "'"
connection.query(query, (err, rows, fields) => { // FLAW
if (err) {
res.status(500).send(err.stack)
} else {
res.status(200).send(result.rows)
}
})
})
Remediation
To prevent SQL Injection vulnerabilities, the recommended approach is to use parameterized queries. These structures inherently separate SQL code from data input, neutralizing the potential for input to alter query logic maliciously.
Furthermore, consider these additional precautions:
-
Implement strong input validation and sanitization to enforce expected data patterns and strip potentially harmful characters.
-
Utilize ORM frameworks that abstract direct SQL query writing, inherently minimizing the risk of injection vulnerabilities.
-
Regularly conduct security testing, including SAST reviews, to detect and address potential vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
-
Educate development teams on secure coding practices to integrate security awareness into the development culture.
For the example above, using parameterized queries fixes the vulnerability:
var mysql = require('mysql');
var connection = mysql.createConnection(process.env.DATABASE_URL);
connection.connect();
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/sql_injection', (req, res) => {
const query = 'select * from users where username = ?'
connection.query(query, [req.query.username], (err, rows, fields) => { // FLAW
if (err) {
res.status(500).send(err.stack)
} else {
res.status(200).send(result.rows)
}
})
})
Configuration
The detector has the following configurable parameters:
-
sources
, that indicates the source kinds to check. -
neutralizations
, that indicates the neutralization kinds to check.
Unless you need to change the default behavior, you typically do not need to configure this detector.
References
-
CWE-89 : Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection').
-
OWASP Top 10 2021 - A03 : Injection.
-
OWASP Cheat Sheets Series: SQL Injection Prevention.