DORA - ICT Risk Management Cryptography (Post-Quantum)
Description
PQC-scoped view of the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554). DORA’s ICT risk-management framework requires cryptographic controls and a key-management/encryption policy — implying a cryptographic inventory. DORA sets no post-quantum deadline, so quantum-vulnerable cryptography is surfaced as advisory migration debt.
Rationale
DORA (Art. 9 and its technical standards) requires financial entities to protect ICT systems with cryptographic controls and a maintained encryption/key-management policy, but does not state a PQC date. Modelling the inventory obligation as hard and the post-quantum exposure as advisory stays faithful to the regulation.
Benefits
Financial-sector teams get an inventory-backed view of post-quantum exposure aligned with DORA’s ICT risk-management expectations without overstating a deadline DORA does not set.
DORA — Cryptographic Inventory Maintained
ID |
dora_pqc/crypto_inventory_established |
Severity |
high |
Category |
cryptography/post_quantum |
Optional |
false |
Tags |
crypto, dora, inventory, pqc |
Description
Checks that a cryptographic inventory (a CBOM) is maintained for the project, supporting DORA’s ICT risk-management cryptographic controls and encryption/key-management policy.
Rationale
DORA requires a maintained encryption and key-management policy as part of ICT risk management; a cryptographic inventory is the prerequisite for that policy and for any post-quantum planning.
DORA — Quantum-Vulnerable Cryptography (Advisory)
ID |
dora_pqc/no_quantum_vulnerable_crypto |
Severity |
info |
Category |
cryptography/post_quantum |
Optional |
true |
Tags |
crypto, dora, pqc, quantum |
Description
Surfaces quantum-vulnerable (Shor-broken) public-key cryptography in the project’s inventory as advisory migration debt. DORA sets no post-quantum deadline, so this control never fails — it reports a partial result while such algorithms are present.
Rationale
DORA requires cryptographic controls and operational resilience but states no PQC timeline. Reporting the exposure without a fabricated deadline keeps the assessment honest while flagging the migration as part of ICT risk management.